<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Common Sense SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo</link>
	<description>Ryan Jones Blogs About Internet Culture, Marketing, SEO, &#38; Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:09:08 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heather Paquinas</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo/comment-page-1#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Paquinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re pretty good, but have you tried any of this stuff at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bluehatseo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bluehatseo&lt;/a&gt;? Most of his ideas are more grayhat than strictly whitehat or blackhat seo.

Rose Water

(Ryan&#039;s Note:  Was it really neccessary to add that Rose Water link in here? They all get nofollowed anyway)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re pretty good, but have you tried any of this stuff at <a href="http://www.bluehatseo.com/" rel="nofollow">bluehatseo</a>? Most of his ideas are more grayhat than strictly whitehat or blackhat seo.</p>
<p>Rose Water</p>
<p>(Ryan&#8217;s Note:  Was it really neccessary to add that Rose Water link in here? They all get nofollowed anyway)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo/comment-page-1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I would have liked to be able to query this when the site he mentions first launched.

It &quot;could&quot; be that it got a penalty for too many links,

OR....

as everybody knows, Google uses multiple data centers, and each time you search you could be hitting a different data center.

Since the site in question was really new, it could have been that it didn&#039;t propogate to all the data centers yet... so it was there, then due to a data refresh or something... searchers hit a different data center that didn&#039;t yet know about the site, then boom a few days later as data updated througout all the servers... boom it was back again and ranking well.

I&#039;d really like for Matt Cutts to chime in and issue a statment on whether or not there&#039;s anything a competitor can do to harm your ranking....

 as I still haven&#039;t seen any evidence to make me believe that factors 100% outside of a site owner&#039;s control can penalize him.  (the key word here being penalize, as many seos tend to confuse &quot;lack of reward&quot; with &quot;penalty&quot;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have liked to be able to query this when the site he mentions first launched.</p>
<p>It &#8220;could&#8221; be that it got a penalty for too many links,</p>
<p>OR&#8230;.</p>
<p>as everybody knows, Google uses multiple data centers, and each time you search you could be hitting a different data center.</p>
<p>Since the site in question was really new, it could have been that it didn&#8217;t propogate to all the data centers yet&#8230; so it was there, then due to a data refresh or something&#8230; searchers hit a different data center that didn&#8217;t yet know about the site, then boom a few days later as data updated througout all the servers&#8230; boom it was back again and ranking well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like for Matt Cutts to chime in and issue a statment on whether or not there&#8217;s anything a competitor can do to harm your ranking&#8230;.</p>
<p> as I still haven&#8217;t seen any evidence to make me believe that factors 100% outside of a site owner&#8217;s control can penalize him.  (the key word here being penalize, as many seos tend to confuse &#8220;lack of reward&#8221; with &#8220;penalty&#8221;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Whyte</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo/comment-page-1#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Whyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Aaron walls post on getting a site banned for gaining to many links to fast.

http://www.seobook.com/archives/001550.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron walls post on getting a site banned for gaining to many links to fast.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/001550.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.seobook.com/archives/001550.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doom</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo/comment-page-1#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Doom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 04:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Yeah cutts said google prefers B over strong but not enough to matter...

i cant say for certain, but it is my &#039;hope&#039; that Google sticks with what i belive was the mindset of not ever negatively affecting your rank based on what occurs outside of your domain.

i have read that bowling works, but i havent seen it first hand and &#039;hope&#039; that google only Negatively hits you for your own dumb mistakes on your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah cutts said google prefers B over strong but not enough to matter&#8230;</p>
<p>i cant say for certain, but it is my &#8216;hope&#8217; that Google sticks with what i belive was the mindset of not ever negatively affecting your rank based on what occurs outside of your domain.</p>
<p>i have read that bowling works, but i havent seen it first hand and &#8216;hope&#8217; that google only Negatively hits you for your own dumb mistakes on your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infonote</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>infonote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/common-sense-seo#comment-112</guid>
		<description>I was reading another blog a few days ago which mentioned that he replaced archives with Sitemap, as he said, Google likes the word sitemap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was reading another blog a few days ago which mentioned that he replaced archives with Sitemap, as he said, Google likes the word sitemap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
