<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future Twitter Account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account</link>
	<description>Ryan Jones Blogs About Internet Culture, Marketing, SEO, &#38; Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GrrlTragic</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4030</link>
		<dc:creator>GrrlTragic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 17:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4030</guid>
		<description>I can see the point you&#039;re making but I&#039;ve already had friends banned because too much of their timelines were *auto* or aggregated junk &amp; fillers. Twitter has already stated that those types of accounts will be marked as SPAM so how can people keep their accounts and yet tweet even their toilet trips? There will need to be a certain amount of &quot;real&quot; tweets or else you won&#039;t have an account to connect..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the point you&#8217;re making but I&#8217;ve already had friends banned because too much of their timelines were *auto* or aggregated junk &amp; fillers. Twitter has already stated that those types of accounts will be marked as SPAM so how can people keep their accounts and yet tweet even their toilet trips? There will need to be a certain amount of &#8220;real&#8221; tweets or else you won&#8217;t have an account to connect..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MattiPartonen</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4028</link>
		<dc:creator>MattiPartonen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4028</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan, great stuff and i have bee wondering future of Twitter too;-)and very much similar thoughts with you. When i started last september, since then my use of tweetin has change a lot, i use new tools and i found many useful things. My followings and followers has changed almost totally:-Dbut finally i really dig tweetin;-)so we will see what is coming in the future;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan, great stuff and i have bee wondering future of Twitter too;-)and very much similar thoughts with you. When i started last september, since then my use of tweetin has change a lot, i use new tools and i found many useful things. My followings and followers has changed almost totally:-Dbut finally i really dig tweetin;-)so we will see what is coming in the future;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Pritchard</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4027</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Pritchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4027</guid>
		<description>I wholeheartedly expect a profitable part of my business will be creating applications that communicate across Twitter within a few months.

I think we need to be regarding Twitter as another infrastructure - like the phone line - capable of carrying &#039;voice&#039; in the form of person to person Tweets&#039; and &#039;data&#039; in the form of software to software / software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholeheartedly expect a profitable part of my business will be creating applications that communicate across Twitter within a few months.</p>
<p>I think we need to be regarding Twitter as another infrastructure &#8211; like the phone line &#8211; capable of carrying &#8216;voice&#8217; in the form of person to person Tweets&#8217; and &#8216;data&#8217; in the form of software to software / software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4024</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4024</guid>
		<description>Kristin, that&#039;s part of the problem for twitter.  Once our tweets reach a certain percentage that are automated, people won&#039;t care to read them.  If I don&#039;t have to logon to twitter or a twitter &quot;deck&quot; to post, why would I log on to read? - especially when all of your tweets are just posted by various objects you interact with?

Ideally there will eventually be one status page that incorporates all of those statuses in one place - but we&#039;re not there yet.  I talk about that in my previous blog post:

http://www.dotcult.com/the-social-network-i-want</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristin, that&#8217;s part of the problem for twitter.  Once our tweets reach a certain percentage that are automated, people won&#8217;t care to read them.  If I don&#8217;t have to logon to twitter or a twitter &#8220;deck&#8221; to post, why would I log on to read? &#8211; especially when all of your tweets are just posted by various objects you interact with?</p>
<p>Ideally there will eventually be one status page that incorporates all of those statuses in one place &#8211; but we&#8217;re not there yet.  I talk about that in my previous blog post:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dotcult.com/the-social-network-i-want" rel="nofollow">http://www.dotcult.com/the-social-network-i-want</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4023</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4023</guid>
		<description>Actually it looks like the treadmill at the Gym may be the next thing that starts tweeting for you:

http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/11/twitter-facebook-youtube-technology-personal-netpulse.html?feed=twitter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it looks like the treadmill at the Gym may be the next thing that starts tweeting for you:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/11/twitter-facebook-youtube-technology-personal-netpulse.html?feed=twitter" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2010/01/11/twitter-facebook-youtube-technology-personal-netpulse.html?feed=twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristin Dziadul</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4022</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristin Dziadul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4022</guid>
		<description>This is a great article. I was thinking along the same line last week. I have begun to add more applications to my phone that auto-tweet to Twitter and wondered how many more would be created. Then it would come to a point where we would no longer need to log onto Twitter to tell people where we are, what we are doing, what we are reading, eating, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great article. I was thinking along the same line last week. I have begun to add more applications to my phone that auto-tweet to Twitter and wondered how many more would be created. Then it would come to a point where we would no longer need to log onto Twitter to tell people where we are, what we are doing, what we are reading, eating, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Martine</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/the-future-twitter-account#comment-4021</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Martine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/?p=768#comment-4021</guid>
		<description>A possible future business model for Twitter in this light would be to follow the managed asset reflation path taken by amazon and sell the infrastructure itself to mediate between other services.

I&#039;ve said before that if Twitter really wanted to make money, what they should charge for is access to the API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A possible future business model for Twitter in this light would be to follow the managed asset reflation path taken by amazon and sell the infrastructure itself to mediate between other services.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said before that if Twitter really wanted to make money, what they should charge for is access to the API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

