<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Doesn&#8217;t Google Buy Wikipedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dotcult.com/why-doesnt-google-buy-wikipedia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dotcult.com/why-doesnt-google-buy-wikipedia</link>
	<description>Ryan Jones Blogs About Internet Culture, Marketing, SEO, &#38; Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: berni</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/why-doesnt-google-buy-wikipedia#comment-3390</link>
		<dc:creator>berni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/why-doesnt-google-buy-wikipedia#comment-3390</guid>
		<description>woooouughhh,

Wikipedia is definitely the hottest unclaimed stake in the internet world.

In one sense, I want to be part of it (to make money!), but in another sense, i think it is better that it remains a nature reserve, allowing all the flowers and animals to develop without the oversight of farmers and real estate developers..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woooouughhh,</p>
<p>Wikipedia is definitely the hottest unclaimed stake in the internet world.</p>
<p>In one sense, I want to be part of it (to make money!), but in another sense, i think it is better that it remains a nature reserve, allowing all the flowers and animals to develop without the oversight of farmers and real estate developers..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.dotcult.com/why-doesnt-google-buy-wikipedia#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dotcult.com/why-doesnt-google-buy-wikipedia#comment-99</guid>
		<description>The main reason is, Wikipedia is a not-for-profit and is not for sale.  The Wikipedia community is strongly against ads, so it would be tough to monetize Wikipedia in any case.

In the past, Google has actually offered to host Wikipedia, but even that much dependency on a corporation was too much to take.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main reason is, Wikipedia is a not-for-profit and is not for sale.  The Wikipedia community is strongly against ads, so it would be tough to monetize Wikipedia in any case.</p>
<p>In the past, Google has actually offered to host Wikipedia, but even that much dependency on a corporation was too much to take.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

